College Students Improvised Ideas during Physics Laboratory Activities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58197/prbl/TBAY8568Abstract
This study aims at checking college student-teachers’ transferability ideas from physics laboratory activities to improvised materials. We employed undergraduate students from the University of Rwanda College of Education to carry it out during their laboratory experiments session. Since these students are future secondary teachers, we first observed them performing Ohms Law, Faraday law, Wheatstone bridge, and Compass magnet experiments. We followed them, asking them to compare how they could improvise from what they did at school whenever there were no conventional materials. We found that students face challenges in performing provided experiments even if the instructional protocols are provided and receive laboratory technician support. These students could also not imagine how they could improvise these experiments. These results were caused by the fact that they do not possess improvisation skills, and few experiments were provided to them. In this regard, the author recommends that college lecturers not only increase laboratory experiments but also instruct their students by reflecting on their future careers.
Keywords: undergraduate student teacher, physics laboratory activities, improvised experiments, University of Rwanda College of Education
References
Bell, R. and Smetana, L. (2008) ‘Using Computer Simulations to Enhance Science Teaching and Learning’, in R. Bell, J. Gess-Newsome & J. Luft (eds). Technology in the secondary science classroom. (pp. 23-32). New York: National Science Teachers Association.
Kira, E. and Nchunga, A. (2016) ‘Improvisation in teaching physics concepts : Teachers ’ experiences and perceptions’, International Journal of Research Studies in Educational Technology, 5(1), pp. 49–61. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrset.2016.1380.
Krišťák, Ľ., Němec, M. and Danihelová, Z. (2014) ‘Interactive Methods of Teaching Physics at Technical Universities’, Informatics in Education, 13(1), pp. 51–71.
Ndihokubwayo, K. (2017) ‘Investigating the Status and Barriers of Science Laboratory Activities in Rwandan Teacher Training Colleges towards Improvisation Practice.’, Rwandan Journal of Education, 4(1), pp. 47–54.
Ndihokubwayo, K. (2021) ‘Step by step guidelines on improvising laboratory experiment materials’, Voice of Research, 10(2), pp. 1–12. Available at: http://www.voiceofresearch.org/Doc/Sep-2021/Sep-2021_1.pdf.
Ndihokubwayo, K., Uwamahoro, J. and Ndayambaje, I. (2019) ‘An Assessment of the Impact of Improvised versus Conventional Laboratory Equipment on Students’ Performance in Thermal Expansion’, African Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics and Sciences, 15(1), pp. 135–140. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4314/ajesms.v15i1.11.
Sokoloff, D.R., Laws, P.W. and Thornton, R.K. (2007) ‘RealTime Physics : active learning labs transforming the introductory laboratory’, European Journal of Physics, 28, pp. 83–S94. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/28/3/S08.
Tarhan, L. and Sesen, B.A. (2010) ‘Investigation the effectiveness of laboratory works related to “ acids and bases ” on learning achievements and attitudes toward laboratory’, Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), pp. 2631–2636. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.385.
Volkwyn, T.S. et al. (2008) ‘Impact of a conventional introductory laboratory course on the understanding of measurement’, Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 4(1), pp. 1–10. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.4.010108.
White, R.T. (2007) ‘International Journal of Science The link between the laboratory and learning’, International Journal of Science Education, 18(7), pp. 761–774. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069960180703.
Woodley, E. (2009) ‘Practical work in school science why is it important?’, School Science Review, 91(335), p. 4951.
