Training STEM Teachers in Resource-Constrained Environments: Are Computer-Based Technologies Effective?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58197/p221yn10Keywords:
STEM education, Resource-constrained environments, Animations, Virtual labs, pre-service teachersAbstract
This study investigates the effectiveness of computer-based technologies, such as computer animations and virtual labs, in enhancing STEM education, particularly in resource-constrained environments. The research focuses on pre-service biology teachers at the University of Rwanda-College of Education (UR-CE) and examines the impact of these technologies on their teaching and students' academic performance. Employing an Exploratory Sequential Mixed Methods design, the study first explores pre-service teachers' perceptions through qualitative focus group discussions and then tests hypotheses quantitatively with a quasi-experimental approach involving secondary school students. Results show that traditional teaching methods result in minimal improvement in student performance while using computer animations and virtual labs significantly enhances understanding and academic achievement. The study highlights the potential of technology to overcome the limitations of inadequate resources, making complex subjects like molecular biology more accessible and engaging. These findings suggest that integrating such technologies could be a viable strategy for improving STEM education in developing regions. Future research should explore the long-term effects of these tools on teaching efficacy and sustainable student performance in all STEM subjects.
References
Ahmad, A. M., Yakob, N., & Ahmad, N. J. (2018). “Science, technology, engineering and mathematic (STEM) Education in Malaysia: Preparing the pre-service science teachers.” Journal of Natural Science and Integration, 1(2), 159-165. https://doi.org/10.24014/jnsi.v1i2.6595
Aebersold, M., Rasmussen, J., & Mulrenin, T. (2020, January). “Virtual everest: Immersive virtual realitycan improve the simulation experience.” Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 38(C), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2019.09.004
Bergsten, C., Frejd, P. (2019). “Preparing pre-service mathematics teachers for STEM education: an analysis of lesson proposals.” ZDM Mathematics Education 51, 941–953. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01071-7
Ejiwale, J. A. (2013). “Barriers to successful implementation of STEM education.” Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 7(2), 63-74. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v7i2.220
Hamed, G.A., ljanazrah, A. (2020). “The Effectiveness of Using Virtual Experiments on Students' Learning in the General Physics Lab.” Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 19 (977-996). https://doi.org/10.28945/4668
Hoon, T. S., Aris, S. R. S., Ibrahim, N., & Isa, B. (2022). “Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education in university: Pre-service teachers' perceptions.” Asian Journal of University Education, 18(3), 637-648. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v18i3.18951
Galadima, U., Ismail, Z., & Ismail, N. (2019). “A new pedagogy for training the pre-service mathematics teachers readiness in teaching integrated STEM education.” International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, 8(5), 1272-1281. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijeat.E1181.0585C19
Occa, A., & Morgan, S. E. (2022). “The role of cognitive absorption in the persuasiveness of multimedia messages.” Computers & Education, 176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104363
Orhan, T. Y., & Sahin, N. (2018). “The impact of innovative teaching approaches on biotechnology knowledge and laboratory experiences of science teachers.” Education Sciences, 8(4), 213. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8040213
McKnight, K., O'Malley, K., Ruzic, R., Horsley, M. K., Franey, J. J., & Bassett, K. (2016). “Teaching in a digital age: How educators use technology to improve student learning.” Journal of research on technology in education, 48(3), 194-211. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2016.1175856
Mayer, R. (2005). “The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning.” Cambridge, U.K. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mukagihana, J., Nsanganwimana, F., Aurah, C. (2021). “Effect of resource-based instructions on pre-service biology teachers' motivation toward learning biology.” Lumat, 9(1), 873-891. https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.9.1.1637
Nyamupangedengu, E. (2015). “Teaching genetics to pre-service teachers: a teacher educator's approach to transformative practice through self-study” (Doctoral dissertation, University of the Witwatersrand, Faculty of Humanities, School of Education).
Ryu, M., Mentzer, N., & Knobloch, N. (2019). “Pre-service teachers' experiences of STEM integration: Challenges and implications for integrated STEM teacher preparation.” International journal of technology and design education, 29, 493-512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-018-9440-9
Smetana, L. K., & Bell, R. L. (2012). “Computer simulations to support science instruction and learning: A critical review of the literature.” International Journal of Science Education, 34(9), 1337-1370. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.605182
Teo, T. (2011). “Factors influencing teachers' intention to use technology: Model development and test.” Computers & Education, 57(4), 2432-2440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.008
Yilmaz‐Tuzun, O., & Topcu, M. S. (2008). “Relationships among pre-service science teachers' epistemological beliefs, epistemological world views, and self‐efficacy beliefs.” International Journal of Science Education, 30(1), 65-85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-007-9084-1
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Classroom Practices
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
